Curse

freaky naughty · Apr 01, 2008, 10:14 PM // 22:14

/Signed, ubersigned greatest suggestion ever.

assassin shaun · Apr 02, 2008, 11:04 AM // 11:04

/signed

its a great idea

nocluenoose · Apr 07, 2008, 10:45 AM // 10:45

/Signed

its a pain to dedicated minis when u hv 10 characters

Varkovsky · Apr 07, 2008, 02:48 PM // 14:48

/signed... again

ScoobyDooby Dooo · Apr 07, 2008, 03:12 PM // 15:12

im with witchblade on this only for titles, pets i wudnt even dedicate my rare 1's only have few in there....

/SIGNED

Hyper.nl · Apr 08, 2008, 07:20 AM // 07:20

/signed before.
/signed again.

This is the way I imagined HoM to be from the time of it's announcement. As a place for the achievements of a player rather than a character.

Monk Gsb · Apr 08, 2008, 07:36 AM // 07:36

/signed for this,

why exactly would i make a destroyer staff on my warrior AND customise it :S ?

Arduin · Apr 08, 2008, 07:46 AM // 07:46

What if your single-character-HoM unlocks stuff for your GW2-account?

hippo942 · Apr 08, 2008, 08:11 AM // 08:11

/signed

this is the reason i dont ded my pets

Drews0 · Apr 08, 2008, 09:12 AM // 09:12

/Signed
Some people just don't play enough to get the some 1000ectos required to a) fill 10 char's destroyer weapons display case and
b) same goes for elite armor sets
oh and some people would really enjoy not having to spend 3000hours/char to get godlike ranks

Not that I'm against the idea of investing effort... just that if Arenanet really wants us o put that much time into it, they shouldn't make huge advantages for people with no life but who get 10 full halls.

MithranArkanere · Apr 08, 2008, 10:42 AM // 10:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drews0

/Signed
Some people just don't play enough to get the some 1000ectos required to a) fill 10 char's destroyer weapons display case and
b) same goes for elite armor sets
oh and some people would really enjoy not having to spend 3000hours/char to get godlike ranks

Not that I'm against the idea of investing effort... just that if Arenanet really wants us o put that much time into it, they shouldn't make huge advantages for people with no life but who get 10 full halls.

Or people that just play as a single character, compared to those that bought many slots to play with them.

Sjeng · Apr 25, 2008, 10:56 AM // 10:56

Sorry for the thread resurrect, but here's my solution to al the HoM issues:

I really like the idea mentioned here of GW2 having a HoM displaying the weapons you placed in it in GW1, and then any character you make in GW2 could choose to take them out in the form of a "token", which can be exchanged for a "Legacy" weapon corresponding with the type of weapon in the HoM. The Legacy weapon would be a unique GW2 skin.

This would mean that the GW2 HoM would have to be ''account-wide'', so you can choose which character you created in GW2 is going to "inherit" a weapon. And you'd have to be able to choose any weapon you placed in the HoM.
This way you could create multiple classes and select the Legacy weapon you can best use on your new character(s) out of one account-wide HoM.

There is another thing I would like to see:
* Make weapons placed in the HoM ''dedicated'' and not ''customized''.
* Make the HoM's of all your characters add up in the GW2 account-wide HoM.

Why? Because now in Gw1 the HoM's are character based. We currently don't know how the Gw2 HoM will work. The way it looks now, it's not wise to spread out all your accomplishments, minipets, hero alite armor and valor weapons across your characters, because you'll end up with multiple half-filled HoM's. So to be on the safe side, people collect stuff like mini's, elite armor for heroes and themselves and destroyer weapons, and add them in the HoM of their MAIN character. This results in two problems imo:

:* Because valor weapons get customized, you can only use them on the selected main character and his/her heroes. This makes no sense to me, as I'd like to be able to use these elite weapons on my own characters, not my main characters' heroes. Make them either dedicated or, better yet, make sure all Gw1 HoM's are added up in the Gw2 HoM (which therefore should need to be account wide!), and problem solved.
:* As long as we don't know how the Gw2 HoM will work, people that like to hunt for titles and stuff to place in their HoM, will start using their secondary characters less, and their main character more. This results in less variety in classes in the game being played, which is bad imo.

So to conclude: Making the Gw2 HoM account wide AND adding up all achievements, minipets, hero armor, valor-weapons and elite armor from all your GW1 HoM's into the Gw2 HoM would ensure multiple positive things:

:* people would no longer feel the need to play ONE main character in Gw1, making the game more diverse again. (title hunting on multiple characters is more fun too imo, unless you want to have a high KoaBD title)
:* you could customize whichever weapon you like on whichever character you have on your Gw1 account to their respective HoM's, and continue using them on those characters instead of the main characters heroes. The Gw2 HoM would display them all anyway.
:* Having Elite armor on multiple characters would pay off. Of course, elite armor of a certain profession would only be availabe as "legacy" armor in Gw2 to a character of a corresponding class (which doesn't necesarily have to be the same profession, as Gw2 will probably have entirely different classes)
:* Double achievements would just be available as "legacy" titles in Gw2 as many times as you achieved them in Gw1. You could choose which characters in Gw2 inherit which titles. Same with double weapons.

Lastly I'd like to see it possible to add ALL end-game greens from ALL campaigns to the HoM. Possibly also tormented weapons.

Turtle222 · May 04, 2008, 07:56 PM // 19:56

Rezzingthread after about 9 days because i want to say:

/signed

it is rather frustrating having to do HoM for all of your characters. I left the others and just focused on my main.

RyXXed · May 04, 2008, 08:08 PM // 20:08

/signed

It's annoying focusing everything on one character because of GW2.

Solas · May 04, 2008, 08:24 PM // 20:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hyper.nl

/signed before.
/signed again.

This is the way I imagined HoM to be from the time of it's announcement. As a place for the achievements of a player rather than a character.

QFT
This is how it should have been from the start, at least for titles armor and weapons.

Hero's and mini's im not sure but it would be great if it was all account-wide

/signed X 1 Trillion ( think thats the most that its been signed so HA!)

GW should be remembre for the great game it was and not what you did on 1 char.

Gregslot · May 04, 2008, 09:21 PM // 21:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by RyXXed

/signed

It's annoying focusing everything on one character because of GW2.

Agreed.
The whole system of titles and adding stuff to the HoM should be changed.
Everyone that has multiple characters would be pleased not having to play with only one character BECAUSE YOU WILL GET ANOTHER TITLE BY FOCUSING ALL YOU DO IN ONE CHARACTER (kind of a big deal).

The whole title counter should be account wide. Whats the point of vanquishing an area with one character and having to do it with another character to count? The same goes for exploring and mission and dungeons, and about everything.
Doing something with one character already proves I (the player) did it.
This way ppl who have multiple characters can be happy by plaing with all their characters if he feels like it and people who play with only one character will feel no change at all.

Like i said, titles, kind of a big deal, HoM and GW2 "rewards" killed my other 4 characters! Great!

shoyon456 · May 04, 2008, 09:28 PM // 21:28

yeah, /signed

Really, I enjoy my new paragon I started...however,
It seems pretty pointless to work on getting her because my derv doesn't even have many maxed titles and isn't complete.

Oh well, it won't change...

Nightmares Hammer · May 04, 2008, 09:31 PM // 21:31

/notsigned.

Just to be an asshole.

/signed

MithranArkanere · May 04, 2008, 09:33 PM // 21:33

Well, if the grind titles were made account-wide, and since Dedicated miniatures are usually used by all characters in the account, and since armor and heroes are exclusive to characters, then only Devotion(miniatures) and Valor(weapons) are left.

Those two are the monuments that should be account wide.

Then, heroes, pets, armors and achievement titles (protector, guardian, etc) would be character-based.

Maria The Princess · May 04, 2008, 09:59 PM // 21:59

/signed defenetly

i hate feeling that by maxing out/grinding a title on one character is a waste cuz i shoudl have done this onmy main